Most of what we hear about in the tech world these days is how artificial intelligence is being used to automate processes, and in manufacturing, it鈥檚 been about听making machines faster, smarter and more connected.
Factories have embraced robotics, automation, AI-powered analytics and more complicated tech in an attempt to improve efficiency and reduce costs. But, despite all this progress, there are plenty of manufacturers that are still being slowed down by something surprisingly simple. That is, manual data entry.
If you鈥檙e thinking, 鈥尘补苍耻补濒听data entry? In 2026?鈥 I can assure you, you鈥檙e not alone.
It sounds almost too mundane and old-school to be a major business challenge, especially now, in the 鈥済olden鈥 age of AI. But more and more often, experts argue that the biggest obstacle to productivity isn鈥檛 what happens on the production line itself, but rather what happens between systems, spreadsheets and people. How are things being tracked, recorded and communicated is almost as important as the primary processes.
听
The Last Mile Problem
听
The challenge is often described as the 鈥渓ast mile鈥 of digital transformation. Businesses may have invested heavily in automation, but information still needs to move between enterprise software, production equipment and employees. When those systems don鈥檛 communicate effectively, people end up acting as the bridge.
Essentially, companies have all this fancy, advanced technology one each end of a process, but no way to properly bridge the two.
According to a recent white paper released by Markem-Imaje in May 2026, around 75% of manufacturers still face a gap between their information technology (IT) systems and operational technology (OT) systems on the factory floor. This disconnect often forces operators to manually enter data multiple times across different systems, creating inefficiencies and increasing the risk of errors.
In an era of highly automated manufacturing, that statistic feels surprisingly high. It seems almost unfathomable that while complex computer systems and artificial intelligence are working hard in the background, we have humans manually entering data to bridge these gaps.
The reality is that many modern factories are far more technologically advanced than the processes supporting them. The problem is, production equipment may be automated, but the information feeding those machines often isn鈥檛, and that鈥檚 a problem.
听
More from Tech
- While Tech Cut Jobs It Quietly Rewired How Engineers Work
- Everybody鈥檚 Talking About Steppa: Finally, A Way To Lose Weight And Money At The Same Time
- Why Are Tech Entrepreneurs Choosing Turkey As their Next Business Base?
- Why Nigeria Continues To Dominate African Tech
- How to Build Broadband Failover Before An Outage Happens
- What Is Super Convergence In Tech?
- Could The UK Become A Leader In Sustainable Space Tech?
- Is Antivirus Software Alone Sufficient For Total Cybersecurity?
听
They May Be Small Errors, But They Create Big Problems
听
A single manual error can have consequences that go far beyond the initial typo. Incorrect product information, labelling mistakes or inventory discrepancies can travel through multiple systems before being discovered. The more connected a supply chain becomes, the more expensive these mistakes can be.
Stephen Tagg, Global Application Sales Manager Software at Markem-Imaje reinforces this point:
鈥淲hen manufacturers discuss digital transformation, the focus often falls on robotics, AI, predictive maintenance and advanced analytics. These are important areas, but they all depend on one thing: accurate, connected, real-time data.
鈥淭his is where many factories still struggle.
Production orders may sit in an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. Manufacturing data may be managed through a Manufacturing Execution System (MES). Inventory and warehousing may be controlled through a Warehouse Management System (WMS). But the final stages of production听鈥 where products are coded, labelled, verified and prepared for distribution 鈥 often still involve manual steps, isolated systems or disconnected equipment.
鈥淥perators may still be selecting messages manually, entering batch numbers, changing date codes or transferring information between systems. These tasks may seem small, but across multiple shifts, product changeovers, lines and sites, they create risk.鈥
This report by Markem-Imaje estimates that manual data entry is responsible for around 20% of production mistakes, including packaging and printing errors. While a typo might seem insignificant in the moment, in manufacturing, it can lead to costly rework, wasted materials, compliance issues and delays further down the supply chain.
For manufacturers that operating on increasingly tight margins, even small inefficiencies can quickly become expensive. They simply can鈥檛 afford little mistakes, because at the end of the day, they don鈥檛 have small consequences.
听
The Growing Pressure of Traceability
听
This challenge is becoming even more important as manufacturers prepare for new traceability requirements.
The upcoming GS1 Sunrise 2027 is a global initiative to replace traditional barcodes with data-rich 2D barcodes that can store information such as expiry dates, traceability data and product details, storing significantly more product information than traditional barcodes. That means manufacturers will need to manage larger volumes of data and ensure information remains accurate across the production process.
According to the white paper, the challenge isn鈥檛 just about implementing new barcode technology. It鈥檚 creating the connected infrastructure that鈥檚 required to manage and distribute the data behind those codes.
In other words, the future of traceability depends just as much on data management as it does on packaging technology.
听
Manufacturing鈥檚 Hidden Digital Transformation Challenge
听
The issue extends well beyond manufacturing.听Writing in Forbes, Amy Gu described manual data entry as one of the most persistent bottlenecks in digital transformation despite years of investment in cloud software, AI and automation. Many organisations have modernised their core systems whilst overlooking the data-capture processes at the edges of the business, where delays and errors often originate. And manufacturers are experiencing a similar problem.
Factories generate enormous amounts of information through sensors, software platforms and connected machinery. The challenge isn鈥檛 just about collecting data anymore, it鈥檚 ensuring that data moves accurately and seamlessly between systems without human intervention.
As factories become more connected, the value of information increasingly depends on how easily it can flow. Because what鈥檚 the point in having the data if nothing can be done with it?
听
Could Invisible Data Become the Next Competitive Advantage?
听
For years, Industry 4.0 has been associated with robotics, IoT devices and artificial intelligence. But perhaps the next phase of manufacturing innovation will be less visible.
Rather than focusing only on faster machinery or smarter robots, manufacturers are increasingly looking for ways to make data collection and transfer happen automatically in the background.
The goal isn鈥檛 just to save employees鈥 time; it鈥檚 to eliminate friction throughout the entire production process.
That could mean automated data capture, real-time synchronisation between IT and OT systems, or software platforms that remove the need for repetitive manual inputs altogether.
听
The Future Isn鈥檛 Juster Faster Machines
听
The manufacturing sector has spent years investing in physical automation, and the next challenge, it seems, may be informational automation.
After all, a factory can only move as quickly as the information flowing through it. And while machinery continues to become faster, smarter and more efficient, many businesses are still relying on people to manually move data from one place to another.
The biggest bottleneck in manufacturing isn鈥檛 just the machines on the factory floor, it鈥檚 the information moving between them.
