Amid growing pressure for details about the use of facial recognition in London鈥檚 King鈥檚 Cross, is it time to start thinking about new facial recognition laws?
The developers of a 67-acre site in the King鈥檚 Cross area of central London has installed facial recognition technology.
Under the current data protection laws, firms need to prove that there is a need to record and use people鈥檚 images.
While the area developers said the tool was used to 鈥渆nsure public safety鈥�, many feel unsettled by the total lack of transparency shown by the landowners 鈥� as no one, including the local council, was aware that facial recognition was in use until the Financial Times revealed it.
The incident has raises questions about how private land used by the public is monitored and about whether we should be protected by law?
With such rapid changes in technology it seems more and more often that our government can鈥檛 keep up with the current rate of change.
The surveillance camera commissioner, Tony Porter, has made 鈥渞epeated calls鈥� for regulation to be strengthened but has been met with the challenge of generating that debate at government level.
Just last month, MPs on the Commons Science and Technology Committee called for the police to stop using live facial recognition tools, highlighting concerns about accuracy and bias.
Now it seems that private land owners have the ability to employ facial recognition technology with few restrictions to regulate the practice and protect the public鈥檚 interest.
Independent researcher, Stephanie Hare, said: 鈥淲e need to have laws about all biometrics including ones we haven鈥檛 even thought about yet.鈥�
鈥淲e need to future-proof it. We need to discuss hugely its role in the private sector. The police and the government is one thing, we need to know if the private sector is allowed to do this and if so, under what conditions?鈥�
