Tech giant Amazon has agreed to pay a substantial $25 million settlement to the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over allegations that it violated children鈥檚 privacy rights through its popular voice assistant, Alexa.
The company was accused of failing to comply with parents鈥� requests to delete Alexa recordings, retaining sensitive data for extended periods without authorisation.
听
FTC involvement
听
The FTC complaint highlighted that Amazon had provided repeated assurances to users, including parents, that they would delete voice recordings collected by the Alexa system. However, the company failed to fulfil this promise, storing the data for years and using it unlawfully to enhance its Alexa algorithm.
Samuel Levine, director of the FTC鈥檚 Bureau of Consumer Protection, condemned Amazon鈥檚 actions. He accused the company of misleading parents, indefinitely retaining children鈥檚 recordings and disregarding deletion requests. Levine commented that Amazon prioritised profit over privacy, sacrificing users鈥� personal information for its own gain.
听
More from News
- From Workouts To Managing Jetlag: The British Tech Scale-Up That Just Hit One Million Users Globally Appoints New CEO
- Hackers Tricked Instagram鈥檚 AI To Leak Your Log In Details 鈥� How Can Users Stay Protected?
- New Research Reveals The UK鈥檚 Top 10 鈥淔uture-Ready鈥� Cities
- New Research Shows How Elections Are Impacting The Job Market 鈥� Here鈥檚 How
- Is London Becoming The World鈥檚 Next AI Capital?
- Google鈥檚 AI Can鈥檛 Even Spell 鈥淕oogle鈥� 鈥� So Why Is It Replacing Search?
- Will AI Labels Actually Save YouTube From AI Slop?
- The Rise Of 鈥淣ew Brand鈥� Cybercrime Groups And The Business Of Ransomware
Ring also in the firing line
听
In addition to the Alexa case, Amazon鈥檚 subsidiary Ring, known for its doorbell cameras, will also pay a settlement. Ring has agreed to pay $5.8 million after allegations emerged that it granted its employees unrestricted access to customers鈥� data. The FTC stated that thousands of Ring employees and contractors had access to customers鈥� private spaces, enabling them to view and download sensitive video data for personal use.
The complaint revealed that an employee had accessed thousands of video recordings belonging to female Ring camera users, which included intimate spaces within their homes such as bathrooms and bedrooms. The employee鈥檚 actions were only halted when a colleague discovered them.
The FTC criticized Ring鈥檚 disregard for privacy and security, emphasizing that such actions exposed consumers to the risks of spying and harassment. Levine emphasized that the FTC鈥檚 order sends a clear message that prioritizing profit over privacy will not go unpunished.
In response to the allegations, Amazon stated that Ring had already addressed the issues independently years before the FTC initiated its inquiry. However, the complaint provided evidence of Ring鈥檚 failures in protecting user privacy, pointing out the employee鈥檚 unauthorized access to sensitive video recordings.
Amazon, while denying any violation of the law, expressed disagreement with the FTC鈥檚 claims concerning both Alexa and Ring. Nevertheless, the company decided to settle the matters, stating that these settlements would put the issues behind them. Amazon further reassured customers of its commitment to enhancing privacy features in its products.
