Modern video stacks now combine speech recognition, computer vision and multimodal indexing to chop up raw footage into structured data. Spoken words, logos and specific scene changes are converted into crisp metadata that AI search engines can parse and cite, instead of just ranking clips in a list. User-generated videos on TikTok, Reels and Shorts are no longer just thumb-stopping content; they’re being scraped and tagged by AI models as cold, hard evidence.

This capability is already active across commercial software. Videowise launched an AI Visibility feature for Shopify storefronts in September, parsing social clips frame by frame to produce structured data for ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. Competitors such as Vyrill process user-generated videos, scanning dialogue, objects and sentiment to build searchable product directories out of social posts.

At the foundational level, Gemini 1.5 analyses video streams in real time to index critical moments for search retrieval. The heavy presence of YouTube inside AI Overviews is also driving marketing teams to draft creator scripts as functional search copy.

How Product Placement Becomes Searchable Inventory

Once computer vision tags a specific item or logo inside a casual user clip, that video stops acting like a one-off social post. It turns into retrievable inventory, something an e-commerce site can pull into internal search, a merchant can stick next to a buy button or ChatGPT can cite as proof that people actually buy the product.

Product placement is morphing from a passive reach strategy into a hard data layer. Every visual appearance is logged, indexed and repurposed as structured proof, which replaces the old metric of simple view counts.

Talent agencies are already telling brands to draft creator scripts as functional search copy, loading them with specific product names and clear problem-solution framing instead of leaning purely on tone and aesthetic. Success now depends on accurate transcripts, descriptions and chapter markers so AI parsers can index clips the same way they process long-form articles. Strategic on-screen text, featuring key terms and product names, is now mandatory to anchor spoken audio.

Briefs have shifted from a simple “make it go viral” to “make it viral and also machine-readable,” ultimately changing how creator content is pitched and produced.

Are Creators Now Optimising For AI Instead Of Humans?

It鈥檚 already taking hold in subtle ways. Agencies are hyping “video SEO 2.0”, encouraging creators to write scripts that read like searchable articles while maintaining a casual delivery.

The standard production checklist now mirrors classic web search tactics, borrowing the same instinct that drives written SEO and applying it to a different medium: pacing, framing and visual structure instead of headers and keyword density. Some teams are even testing screen pacing by leaving a key graphic or logo frozen on screen for a few extra seconds, purely for AI models to index it properly.

The likely outcome is a hybrid optimisation target that didn鈥檛 exist before: content built to perform on human engagement metrics while simultaneously delivering machine interpretability through clean transcripts, detectable objects and a clear semantic structure a system can parse.

What Gets Lost When A Video Is Built To Be Read?

AI models have the artistic soul of an Excel spreadsheet. They want direct product shoutouts, rigid problem-solution scripts and clear visuals. Nuance, dry humour and double entendres are completely lost in translation.

By forcing creators to play nice with indexers, brands risk turning creator content into generic noise. Identical structures and forced callouts result in every post sounding like a carbon copy, regardless of how fancy the camera work is.

Tailoring content for machine parsing threatens the unique personality and raw emotion that draw human audiences in. If a campaign’s ROI depends on AI citations, marketers must confront the uncomfortable reality of who they鈥檙e actually building content for: the human scroller or the indexing bot.

The industry has yet to figure out what authentic creator content means once technical schema and machine-readable scripts become mandatory. What lies ahead is a split creator space, balancing human entertainment on one side and machine retrievability on the other.

The post How AI Video Indexing Is Reshaping Influencer Marketing And Creator Content Strategy appeared first on 91探花.

From visa routes and startup funding to tax incentives, research support and business programmes, the country has introduced a range of measures designed to encourage entrepreneurship and investment.

Why Does The UK Want To Attract Entrepreneurs?

Entrepreneurs play an important role in the UK economy by creating businesses, generating employment and introducing new products, services and ideas. Attracting entrepreneurs can also help the UK strengthen its position in competitive industries, increase investment and encourage innovation. International entrepreneurs can bring new skills, experience and connections to the country, while successful businesses can contribute to local and national economic growth.听

By creating an environment where entrepreneurs can start and expand companies, the UK can support job creation, investment and long-term economic development.

How Does The UK Support New Business Creation?

The UK has several forms of support available to people who want to start and grow a business. This support comes from the government, local authorities, financial organisations, universities and private-sector organisations.

Some of the ways the UK supports new business creation include:

• Business advice and guidance: Entrepreneurs can access information and advice on starting, running and growing a business.
• Government-backed finance: Programmes such as the British Business Bank’s schemes can help eligible businesses access finance.
• Startup support programmes: Incubators, accelerators and business support programmes can provide mentoring, training and networking opportunities.
• Tax reliefs and incentives: Certain tax schemes can reduce the financial burden on businesses and encourage investment in innovation.
• University support: Universities often provide entrepreneurs with access to expertise, research facilities, incubators and business networks.

What Funding Opportunities Are Available To Entrepreneurs In The UK?

Entrepreneurs in the UK can choose from several sources of funding depending on the type and stage of their business. These include traditional bank loans, government-backed finance, grants, angel investment, venture capital and crowdfunding. Startups can also look for investment from angel investors and venture capital firms, particularly when they have strong growth potential.听

What Is The UK Doing To Attract More Entrepreneurs?

The UK uses a combination of immigration routes, financial incentives, business support and investment opportunities to attract entrepreneurs and encourage new businesses. These measures are designed to make it easier for talented founders to establish themselves in the country while creating an environment where innovative businesses can grow.

Offering Visa Routes For International Entrepreneurs

The UK provides immigration routes that can allow eligible international founders and business professionals to establish themselves in the country. The Innovator Founder visa, for example, is aimed at people who want to establish an innovative, viable and scalable business in the UK. This gives international entrepreneurs a potential pathway to build a company while contributing their skills and ideas to the UK economy.

Supporting Innovative Businesses

The UK places significant emphasis on innovation and new technology. Government programmes and organisations support businesses developing new products, technologies and services, particularly where these could contribute to economic growth. This support can help entrepreneurs turn innovative ideas into commercial businesses.

Supporting Research And Development

The UK encourages businesses to invest in research and development through government support and tax incentives. This can be particularly valuable for entrepreneurs developing new technology, products or processes that require significant investment before they reach the market.

Building Strong Startup Hubs

The UK has established startup communities in cities and regions across the country. London remains a major centre for finance, technology and entrepreneurship, while cities such as Manchester, Cambridge, Edinburgh, Bristol and Birmingham have developed their own business and technology ecosystems. These hubs give entrepreneurs access to talent, investors, universities and other businesses.

Providing Support For Small Businesses

Small businesses can access government guidance, finance programmes and local support designed to help them overcome some of the challenges involved in starting and growing a company. This provides entrepreneurs with resources beyond their own capital and experience during the early stages of building a business.

What Role Does Digital Technology Play In UK Entrepreneurship?

Digital technology has become an important part of entrepreneurship in the UK, allowing businesses to launch, operate and reach customers in new ways.听

Online platforms can reduce some of the costs associated with starting a company, while e-commerce allows businesses to sell beyond their immediate geographical area. Cloud software, artificial intelligence, digital payments and online marketing can also help small businesses manage operations and compete with larger companies.听

Is the UK Still An Attractive Destination For Entrepreneurs?

The UK remains an attractive destination for many entrepreneurs because of its established business environment, access to finance, international connections, skilled workforce and strong startup ecosystems. International founders can also benefit from dedicated immigration routes where they meet the relevant requirements.听

However, entrepreneurs must also consider challenges such as the cost of living and operating a business, taxation, competition and regulatory requirements.听

What Does The Future Look Like For Entrepreneurship In The UK?

The future of entrepreneurship in the UK is likely to be shaped by technology, innovation, investment and the country’s ability to remain competitive internationally. Artificial intelligence, fintech, life sciences, green technology and other emerging sectors could create new opportunities for entrepreneurs and investors.

The post What Is The UK Doing To Attract More Entrepreneurs? appeared first on 91探花.

Is an undersized local market a strategic superpower that pushes founders to grow faster and think smarter? Or is it just a handicap on runway, talent and customer acquisition that survivor companies overcome, then retroactively paint as a brilliant strategy?

It鈥檚 easy to credit the small-market theory when looking at Singapore’s biggest tech wins. But survivorship bias tells the same story: the founders for whom a restricted home market was a dealbreaker simply aren鈥檛 written about.

Does The Small-Market Theory Hold Up?

The idea that a small domestic market gives founders an edge is more than a convenient narrative, it’s baked into economic policy.

EnterpriseSG and other state bodies urge startups to target global reach from launch, pointing to a home market of 5.9 million as too small to support big tech exits on its own. The Economic Strategy Review mid-term update makes the same point, and startup surveys back it up, with founders increasingly testing overseas demand from seed stage instead of treating international expansion as a later chapter.

Founders building in Singapore describe a consistent pattern: a restricted domestic base pushed them to think cross-border from day one, simply to make the unit economics work. Analysis from Vertex Ventures puts that boundary as a useful filter, one that stops teams from optimising for an ambiguous local audience and forces early clarity on who the real customer is. Singapore commonly becomes the operational hub for talent, IP and product development, with commercial growth happening across the wider region instead.

Yet the counter-argument makes an equally strong point. Industry watchers insist that commercialisation is still the real hurdle. Too many founders optimise for a tiny domestic pool that can鈥檛 breed tech giants to rival American or Chinese heavyweights. The rare success stories didn’t benefit from a helpful small-market constraint; they succeeded because they built cross-border products straight out of the gate.

Other commentators view the limited domestic audience as an outright ceiling that pushes cash-intensive sectors like deep tech into cautious regional holding patterns rather than aggressive global expansion.

Going global immediately also introduces a level of risk that鈥檚 easy to underestimate. Crossing borders right away jacks up the cost of every wrong turn. A deep-pocketed rival in a large domestic market can test a feature, lose cash and adjust course, but a Singapore-based founder rarely has the runway for that many failed experiments. A compact, highly networked market can also end up rewarding who you know over actual market pull.

The tension is that Singapore’s best-known successes, Grab and Shopee among them, are the companies that executed a global-from-day-one strategy well. Their visibility doesn’t settle whether the constraint benefits founders more broadly.

We put the question straight to Singapore founders: does an undersized home market sharpen global focus from launch, or is it just a hurdle to overcome? And would they have taken a completely different path with a large domestic customer base to rely on first?

Our Experts

• Shammi Thakur, Research Director, Vyansa Intelligence
• Dr Seamus Phan, CTO, McGallen & Bolden Pte Ltd
• Ray Tay, Co-founder, VIVOS Pte. Ltd.
• Oscar Asly, Group CEO, M4Markets

Shammi Thakur, Research Director, Vyansa Intelligence

鈥淔rom a research perspective, I track many Singapore-based companies, and the truth is that both viewpoints hold validity, though the impact varies for each founder.

鈥淐onstraints are real. A market of six million people means you quickly hit a ceiling in terms of local revenue, a point that would take founders in Indonesia or India much longer to reach. At the same time, sourcing talent for specific roles is genuinely difficult and expensive. This isn鈥檛 an advantage. It鈥檚 a constraint that founders must factor into their planning from the very first hire.

鈥淵et the discipline this fosters is also real. Founders who can鈥檛 rely on massive local market scale often bake features like compliance, payments and localisation directly into their products from the start, because planning to operate across five countries is what makes the unit economics work. Companies starting in large domestic markets often add these elements later, a process that can prove quite difficult.

鈥淲here I disagree with the prevailing narrative is the idea that this inherently makes Singaporean founders better strategists. In reality, it often means they have less time, or runway, to make mistakes on market fit before international expansion becomes a necessity. That鈥檚 distinct from superior strategy. And common discourse often falls prey to survivorship bias, overlooking the founders whose companies collapsed under early pressure rather than emerging stronger.鈥�

Dr Seamus Phan, CTO, McGallen & Bolden Pte Ltd

鈥淎s a Singaporean, with family who has done small business in Singapore for the last few decades, there are two sides to look at. As a global strategy and communications consultant, I also serve Singapore-based businesses in the FMCG space, and there are multinational corporations that want to set foot in Singapore specifically to serve as their APAC or ASEAN headquarters, managing a network of communication partners from China to Australia.

鈥淔or other businesses that aren鈥檛 intellectual property or consulting related, but physical goods, the domestic market in Singapore is in fact limiting. For a Japanese business, simply serving the Tokyo market may be sufficient, since there are 14 million people in Tokyo alone. Likewise, a small business serving just Shanghai may be sufficient, given its 24 million residents. But for a Singapore business selling physical products, the incentive is to go regional from the start, whether through e-commerce, working with local channels in target countries, or setting up outlets there directly.

鈥淔or small businesses, the constraint is always capital, whether financial or human. My advice is always to start small and bootstrap, rather than taking loans that create pressure, and to scale slowly and steadily. In the event of imminent failure, the damage is far more easily contained too.鈥�

Ray Tay, Co-founder, VIVOS Pte. Ltd.

鈥淪ix million people and 98 tax treaties. That ratio is the real Singapore story. The small market is a genuine constraint. It caps the revenue you can prove at home, which caps what you can raise and who you can hire. Investors want traction in two or three ASEAN markets before writing a Series A cheque. Founders work around that. It doesn鈥檛 make them sharper.

鈥淲hat Singapore supplies is cheap optionality. The treaty network, banking access and holding-company regime make the paperwork of going regional almost trivial. The operations stay hard. Singapore lowers the cost of the decision, not the cost of execution.

鈥淭he forced-global rule only looks like a law of nature because we count the winners. Grab was told at Harvard that Southeast Asia was too small a market to focus on, and chose Singapore as a base for the region after Malaysia鈥檚 own sovereign fund passed on backing it. That was a choice, not an inevitability. In the Singapore Business Federation鈥檚 2025 survey, 41% of businesses had never internationalised, and 81% of those had no plans to. Plenty stay home and do fine.

鈥淲ould I have built VIVOS differently with a big home market? Yes, and worse. A large domestic base lets you postpone the regional question, and postponing it is how you end up with a product that only works in one place.鈥�

Oscar Asly, Group CEO, M4Markets

鈥淎 small home market makes you look abroad earlier. It doesn鈥檛 magically make you better at doing business there. There鈥檚 a useful pressure in Singapore: you have to ask quite quickly whether anyone outside your home market wants what you鈥檙e selling. But you鈥檙e also trying to fund that expansion from a smaller customer base. That鈥檚 a real constraint, however neatly we dress it up afterwards.

鈥泪苍 financial services, your technology can cross a border much faster than your licence or your reputation. You still have to understand the customer, build relationships and earn trust in each market. ‘We鈥檙e going into Asia’ is an ambition. It isn鈥檛 a strategy. And yes, there鈥檚 a survivorship problem. We hear from the companies that made it overseas. We hear much less from those that spread themselves too thin trying.

鈥淲ith a bigger home market, I鈥檇 probably have expanded more patiently: built a stronger revenue base and been more selective about where to go next. I鈥檇 still build for international growth, but I wouldn鈥檛 confuse being ready to expand with needing to expand. Singapore forces the question earlier. The quality of the answer is still down to the founder.鈥�

The post Is Singapore鈥檚 Small Market Actually Its Biggest Strategic Advantage? appeared first on 91探花.

However, attracting entrepreneurs requires more than having a large economy. The US also uses immigration pathways, tax incentives, government programmes, funding opportunities and state-level initiatives to encourage business creation and innovation.听

Why Does The US Want To Attract Entrepreneurs?

Entrepreneurs play an important role in the US economy. They create businesses, develop new products and services, employ workers and contribute to local communities. The main reasons the US wants to attract entrepreneurs include:

• Creating jobs: New businesses can create employment opportunities as they grow and expand.
• Supporting economic growth: Successful startups contribute to economic activity through investment, spending, and business expansion.
• Encouraging innovation: Entrepreneurs often introduce new technologies, products and services that can strengthen the US economy.
• Attracting investment: Growing businesses can bring domestic and international investment into the country.
• Supporting local economies: New businesses can bring jobs, investment and services to cities and communities across the country.

How Does The US Support New Business Creation?

The US supports new business creation through a combination of government programmes, access to finance, business support, tax incentives, research funding and a large private-sector investment ecosystem. Entrepreneurs can access resources through federal agencies, while state and local governments may offer additional grants, tax incentives, training and development programmes.听

The country’s large consumer market also gives new businesses an opportunity to test their products and services and expand as they gain customers. Universities and established businesses further contribute to the wider startup ecosystem, giving entrepreneurs access to expertise, networks and potential funding.

What Funding Opportunities Are Available To Entrepreneurs In The US?

Entrepreneurs in the US can access funding from a range of public and private sources. Government-backed programmes can help eligible small businesses access loans and other forms of financial support, while the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programmes provide funding opportunities for certain businesses involved in research and development.听

Beyond government funding, entrepreneurs can seek investment from angel investors, venture capital firms, crowdfunding platforms, banks and other private lenders.听

How The US Is Attracting Entrepreneurs

The US uses several approaches to make the country an attractive place for entrepreneurs. These include financial incentives, support for startups, access to investors and programmes designed to encourage innovation. Immigration policies also play a role in attracting founders and highly skilled individuals from overseas.

Entrepreneur Visa Options

The US offers several immigration pathways that can be relevant to entrepreneurs, investors and highly skilled professionals. These include options such as the E-2 treaty investor visa, EB-5 immigrant investor programme and O-1 visa for individuals with extraordinary ability. While these routes have different requirements and are not all specifically designed as startup visas, they can provide eligible foreign entrepreneurs with ways to establish or operate businesses in the US.

Access To Venture Capital

The US has one of the world’s largest venture capital markets. Entrepreneurs can connect with investors who provide funding to startups with high-growth potential, particularly in areas such as technology, artificial intelligence, biotechnology and fintech. Access to this capital can help founders develop products, hire employees, enter new markets and scale their businesses.

Tax Incentives

Federal, state and local tax incentives can make certain locations more attractive to entrepreneurs and growing companies. Depending on the business and location, incentives may include tax credits, deductions, exemptions, or other forms of support. States and cities can use these incentives to encourage businesses to establish operations and create jobs in their areas.

Strong Startup Ecosystems

Entrepreneurs can benefit from established startup ecosystems in cities such as San Francisco, New York, Boston, Austin and other growing technology and business hubs. These locations provide access to investors, skilled workers, universities, business networks and potential customers. Having these resources in one place can make it easier for startups to launch and scale.

What Challenges Do Entrepreneurs Face In The US?

Although the US offers significant opportunities, entrepreneurs can also face considerable challenges. Starting a business can involve high costs, complex regulations, taxes, insurance requirements and administrative work. Competition can also be intense, particularly in established startup hubs where many businesses are competing for customers, employees and investment.

Access to funding is another challenge, as venture capital and other forms of investment are not equally available to every business or founder.

Is The US Still An Attractive Destination For Entrepreneurs?

Yes, the US remains an attractive destination for entrepreneurs, particularly those building businesses with strong growth potential. Its combination of a large market, established financial system, venture capital, skilled workforce, research institutions, and well-developed startup ecosystems continues to create significant opportunities.听

How Does The US Compare With Other Countries For Entrepreneurs?

The US remains highly competitive internationally, but it is not the only country actively trying to attract entrepreneurs. Countries such as the UK, Canada and the UAE have developed their own startup programmes, immigration pathways, tax incentives and business support initiatives.听

The US stands out for the size of its economy, depth of its venture capital market, number of established technology companies, and access to a large customer base. Other countries may offer advantages in areas such as lower operating costs, simpler immigration processes, or specific tax benefits.

The post What Is The US Doing To Attract Entrepreneurs? appeared first on 91探花.

SHEIN and Temu have taken features that are usually associated with games, including rewards, timers, challenges and surprise offers, and built them into what still looks like an ordinary shopping app.

Online Shopping Has Become A Game

Open Temu and you’re not far from something that feels more like a game than a normal shopping app. There are rewards, countdown offers, interactive promotions and games such as Fishland and spin-the-wheel features. Temu even has dedicated pages for some of these games.

SHEIN has also incorporated gamified features and rewards into its shopping experience. This isn’t just a theory about why these apps are so engaging either 鈥� a 2025 study from Science Direct has found that people showed higher purchase intention when promotions were presented as games rather than traditional discounts.

A normal online shop gives you a product and asks whether you want to buy it; SHEIN and Temu can make the experience feel more like there is always another reward, discount or challenge waiting if you keep looking. Before you know it, you’re not just checking the products anymore. You’re spinning a wheel, chasing a discount or wondering what you’ll get if you keep going.

Your Shopping Feed Isn鈥檛 Random

Underneath the games and promotions, recommendation systems are constantly deciding what products appear in front of you based on how you interact with the app.

Click on something, linger over it or add it to your basket and the feed can respond by showing you similar products or something related; keep scrolling and you’re giving the system more information about what catches your attention.

This is probably why the experience can feel more like your own Pinterest mood board than a normal online store. The feed isn’t a row of products that stays the same every time you visit. Instead, it keeps changing around what you’ve shown an interest in, giving you another reason to see what has appeared since the last time you opened the app.

The Technology Doesn鈥檛 Stop At The App

SHEIN’s model is built around small initial production runs, which means a new style can be tested before the company decides to produce more of it. According to SHEIN鈥橲 2024 sustainability report, new styles usually start with around 100 to 200 items. SHEIN then uses customer response to decide which products should be restocked. Its digital supply-chain system is designed to connect those demand signals with suppliers and production.

That means the app isn’t just helping SHEIN sell products. The activity happening inside the app can help inform what gets produced next.

It Not Just About The Products Anymore

SHEIN and Temu haven’t just added games to shopping 鈥� they’ve made the whole experience feel less like walking into a shop and more like opening an app when you’re bored.

There’s always something new to see, something discounted or some tiny incentive to keep going. You don’t necessarily open the app because you need something anymore; sometimes you open it because you just want to see what’s there.

The post How Have SHEIN And Temu Gamified Online Shopping? appeared first on 91探花.

From there, Dyson has moved into hairdryers, other hair tools, fans, air purifiers, headphones and now toothbrushes. It鈥檚 such a weird variety of products that it makes you wonder how a company built around cleaning carpets has now ended up trying to reinvent the toothbrush.

It Started With A Vacuum

James Dyson鈥檚 frustration with traditional vacuum cleaners came down to a basic problem. As dust filled the bag, it could clog and the vacuum would lose suction. Instead of using a bag to collect the dust, Dyson started experimenting with cyclonic separation, which is a system that uses spinning air to separate dust from the air and collect it in a container.

According to Dyson, it took four years and 5,127 prototypes before the first cyclonic vacuum was ready for production. The DC01 eventually launched in the UK in 1993, after big manufacturers had rejected the technology.

Dyson鈥檚 original selling point wasn鈥檛 just that it had made a better vacuum. Rather, it had questioned something people had completely gotten used to and decided that a product most households took for granted could work differently.

Dyson Found More Ways To Move Air

Dyson had already built up a lot of experience with motors and the movement of air, which gave the company something it could take beyond vacuum cleaners.

The company launched the Airblade hand dryer in 2006, followed by its Air Multiplier fan technology in 2009. The products looked completely different from a vacuum, but the interest and motive was still the same, with Dyson finding new ways to move and control air. This was when Dyson started to look less like a company focused on one type of product and more like a company using its expertise across a bunch of different ones.

The Hairdryer Changed Dyson鈥檚 Image

The Dyson Supersonic came in 2016, and this was probably when people started wondering why a company that was known for vacuum cleaners was suddenly telling people how to dry their hair.

The Supersonic used the company’s digital motor and airflow technology to approach hair drying differently, while Dyson says its development involved understanding the effects of heat and airflow on hair.

Then came the Airwrap in 2018, which took those ideas even further by using controlled airflow and the Coanda effect, where moving air follows a nearby surface and pulls hair around the styling barrels. All of a sudden, Dyson wasn鈥檛 just selling another hairdryer; it was using its airflow technology to give people a different way of styling hair, rather than just competing with the hairdryers and straighteners that were already on the market.

Dyson Got Really Ambitious

The product range continued to grow, which led to cordless vacuums, air purifiers, hair straighteners, lighting and robotics as well as the Dyson Zone in 2022. Dyson says that the Zone combined noise-cancelling headphones with an air-purification system designed to deliver filtered air around the wearer鈥檚 nose and mouth.

The Zone was a big change from the products that had made Dyson famous, moving the company into a completely different type of device. At the same time, it showed how Dyson could take technology from two areas it had already developed and use them together in something entirely new.

Now, Dyson Wants To Reinvent Your Toothbrush

Dyson鈥檚 latest move is into oral care with the CameraJet, which is a toothbrush with a built-in camera designed to identify gaps between teeth as you brush. In its 1 September launch announcement, Dyson says the 100 000-pixel macro camera captures 28 images a second, while machine learning identifies gaps and triggers a targeted jet of mouthrinse.

Oral-B, Philips and other brands already sell connected toothbrushes with features such as app tracking, brushing feedback and sensors. CameraJet takes a different approach, with Dyson using a camera to see where the mouthrinse needs to be directed instead of just tracking how someone brushes their teeth.

Dyson has spent years developing technology around airflow and fluid dynamics, and that work has now found its way into the CameraJet. The same focus on controlling air and liquid that is used across its other products is being used here to direct the mouthrinse exactly where Dyson wants it to go.

Where Does Dyson Go Next?

Looking back at Dyson’s product history, the jump from vacuums to hair tools and then oral care doesn’t seem quite as random as it first does. The company has basically kept taking its engineering into places outside the category where it started.

Whether CameraJet becomes as familiar as the Supersonic or ends up being one of Dyson’s more unusual experiments, it definitely says a lot about where the company is now. Dyson doesn’t really seem interested in staying in its lane, and at this rate, it’s probably better not to expect it to.

The post From Vacuum Cleaners To Toothbrushes: How Did Dyson Build A Global Tech Empire? appeared first on 91探花.

This guide ranks 11 platforms for UK organisations in the 200 to 5,000-plus band, the awkward middle where you’ve outgrown starter software but don’t want a three-year enterprise implementation. Each entry carries a short comparison block that places the platform against the wider field on the rows that decide these deals: best-fit size, native UK payroll, how fast you can go live, and the one thing it does better than most. UK compliance runs underneath all of it, because the Employment Rights Act 2025 has already changed what your records need to prove.

HiBob (Bob): One Modern Core That Carries Mid-size To Enterprise

Core strengths: Bob Core (unified people data, self-service, workflow automation, analytics), native UK and US payroll plus a global Payroll Hub, Bob Hiring ATS, performance and engagement, workforce planning with AI scenario modelling, multi-entity and multi-currency support, GDPR-compliant access controls.

, the platform from HiBob, is built for the exact stretch this guide covers: a company moving from a few hundred people toward a few thousand, often across more than one country. Everything sits on Bob Core, the required foundation holding people data, self-service, workflow automation, and analytics in one place. You add payroll, hiring, performance, or workforce planning as you need them, so the system grows by configuration rather than by ripping out what you have and starting again.

For UK teams, Bob runs native payroll that files with HMRC, handles RTI submissions, and manages pension auto-enrolment inside the same records that drive HR. A salary change made by an HR admin reaches the pay run without a second system in the loop. Multi-entity and multi-currency support means a London headquarters, a Manchester site, and an overseas subsidiary can share one structure while keeping local rules intact. Role-based access controls and audit-ready process history keep the whole thing GDPR-compliant.

The knock against modern suites is that depth tends to cost you the experience. Bob keeps a modern, consumer-grade interface while carrying enterprise-grade workflows, which is why a scaling org can move up-market without a re-platform later. Its main limitation is commercial rather than functional: HiBob doesn’t publish pricing, so a quote means booking a demo. On G2 it holds 4.5 out of 5 spanning more than 1,800 reviews.

Personio: Structured HR For Growing European Teams

Core strengths: core HR records, absence management, performance reviews, approval workflows, employee self-service, reporting dashboards.

Personio built its reputation helping growing UK and European businesses move off spreadsheets and onto structured HR: clean records, absence tracking, approval workflows, and performance reviews in one interface. For a company formalising its processes on the way up from 100 people, it removes a lot of manual work, and reviewers on G2 (4.4 out of 5 spanning more than 800 ratings) tend to praise how intuitive the setup feels.

The limits show as you push into the upper half of this guide’s range. Personio’s centre of gravity sits in the European mid-market, and organisations with complex multinational operations or enterprise-scale processes often reach for extra integrations or a broader suite. G2 reviewers name gaps in features and limited customisation as recurring frustrations, and advanced workforce planning is thinner than on the platforms built for it. UK payroll runs through an integration rather than inside the system, so a pay change crosses a boundary between two tools. For a UK-first company heading toward a few thousand staff across several entities, that gap is worth testing before you sign.

Sage People: Mid-market HR Aligned With The Sage Stack

Core strengths: core HR, workforce analytics, configurable workflows, talent management, reporting dashboards, Salesforce-based platform.

Sage People is a cloud HR system built on Salesforce and aimed at mid-sized organisations, with a natural home inside the wider Sage ecosystem. Teams that already run Sage for finance get aligned reporting and a familiar vendor relationship, plus configurable workflows and workforce analytics that give leadership clearer visibility into headcount and cost.

Its strongest fit is also its constraint. Organisations that want a fully unified HR, payroll, and finance platform have to weigh how Sage People slots into their wider stack, since UK payroll sits alongside it rather than inside it. Implementation can involve careful configuration, and businesses with layered approval structures may need external support to stand it up. For very complex multinational operations it reads as lighter than a dedicated enterprise HCM suite, so the sweet spot stays in the mid-market rather than the top of this range.

BambooHR: A Polished Core With A Scale Ceiling

Core strengths: employee records, onboarding with task lists and e-signatures, reporting, performance as an add-on, employee community, mobile app.

BambooHR earns its reputation on ease of use. The onboarding view, the clean record layout, and the mobile app all make it a comfortable first proper HR system, and its G2 score (4.4 out of 5 spanning more than 5,000 reviews) reflects how much smaller teams enjoy the day-to-day.

The trouble for this audience is headroom. G2 reviewers cite limited customisation as the most common complaint, and the platform’s US-first design shows in UK payroll, which runs through an integration rather than inside the system. Performance management arrives as a paid add-on rather than part of the core, so a growing team can end up buying separate tools for ATS, engagement surveys, and reviews. For a company pushing past 1,500 people or adding entities abroad, the customisation and multi-entity scale it needs tend to sit with other systems on this list.

Rippling: HR, Payroll And IT On One Data Model

Core strengths: unified HR, native payroll, benefits administration, IT and device provisioning, automation across the employee lifecycle, custom workflows, analytics.

Rippling’s pitch is a single data model that stretches past HR into payroll and IT. When someone changes role, salary, or location, the update flows through payroll, app access, and device provisioning without anyone reconciling records by hand. For a scaling company that wants HR and IT joined up, that breadth removes a lot of duplicate admin, and its G2 rating (4.8 out of 5 spanning more than 12,000 reviews) is among the highest here.

That breadth cuts both ways. G2 reviewers point to a demanding learning curve and missing features in specific corners, and the IT crossover means the setup carries more configuration than an HR-only tool. Smaller teams can find the platform does more than they need. For an organisation whose priority is employee experience and engagement rather than device management, some of Rippling’s weight goes unused, so match the tool to how central IT is to your buying case.

Workday: Enterprise HCM Depth For The Largest Teams

Core strengths: advanced people analytics, workforce planning, talent management, multi-entity org modelling, governance and reporting controls.

Workday is the benchmark for enterprise HCM. Large, multi-entity organisations choose it for the depth of its analytics, its workforce planning, and the governance controls that keep a global operation in line. For a business already north of 3,000 people with a dedicated HRIS team, that depth earns its place.

The cost of that depth is speed and everyday usability. G2 reviewers flag a steep learning curve, difficult navigation, and interface design that feels heavier than newer cloud tools, and its 4.1 out of 5 score sits below most of the modern suites here. Implementation is partner-led and measured in months, with total cost of ownership geared to enterprise budgets. A company in the 200 to 1,500 band tends to find Workday delivers more system than it can staff, which is where a modern core wins on speed-to-value.

Employment Hero: All-In-One HR And Pay For Smaller Teams

Core strengths: core HR, recruitment and job posting, performance tools, KeyPay UK payroll, employee benefits.

Employment Hero brings HR, payroll, and employee benefits into one package, which appeals to smaller teams that want a single subscription instead of a stack of point tools. Recruitment, onboarding, and performance features cover the basics, and UK pay runs through KeyPay.

The wrinkles matter more as headcount climbs. G2 reviewers cite missing features and inconsistent customer support, and the Breathe UK comparison notes that switching between the payroll and HR sides can feel clunky, with UK-based help more limited than some rivals offer. Benefits and learning tools often sit on higher tiers, which lifts the real cost above the entry price. For a company scaling past 1,000 people across multiple entities, the depth and multi-entity structure it needs sit with the larger platforms here.

Bright HR: Absence And Rota Basics With Advice Built In

Core strengths: holiday and absence management, rota planning, document storage, employment-law advice line, health and safety add-on, mobile app.

Bright HR suits small UK firms that want the essentials handled without much setup: holiday and absence tracking, rota planning, and a bundled employment-law advice line that smaller businesses without in-house HR appreciate.

For this guide’s audience the ceiling arrives early. The Breathe UK comparison reports that the payroll section is hard to set up, that Bright HR offers a demo rather than a self-serve trial, and that customers sign long two-year contracts that are awkward to exit. There’s no employee recognition tool, tracking overtime is awkward, and the mobile app doesn’t carry every feature. Those are manageable trade-offs for a 40-person company, less so for one heading toward several hundred staff and multiple sites, where absence-and-rota basics leave most of the job undone.

People HR: Essentials-First HR Inside The Access Ecosystem

Core strengths: employee records, holidays and timesheets, performance reviews, drag-and-drop automation, built-in ATS, mobile app.

People HR, part of The Access Group, covers the UK essentials in one place: holidays, timesheets, performance reviews, and records, with a drag-and-drop builder for automating onboarding and approvals. A built-in ATS and a mobile app round out a practical package for UK SMEs, and it sits inside the wider Access ecosystem for teams that want HR near finance and payroll.

The rough edges show up in daily use. Reviews in the Breathe and Rippling UK comparisons note that the interface isn’t the easiest to navigate, that custom reporting is limited on lower plans, and that support levels vary by tier, so smaller customers can wait longer for help. The performance module skips wellbeing and engagement tools, and global capability and advanced analytics stay light compared with enterprise-grade suites. It’s a solid UK essentials tool that a fast-scaling, multi-entity org can grow out of.

ADP: Payroll-First HR With A Compliance Track Record

Core strengths: payroll processing, core HR, time tracking, benefits administration, compliance tooling, workforce reporting.

ADP comes at HR from payroll, and that heritage is its strength. For an organisation where accurate pay and airtight compliance top the list, ADP’s scale and long track record carry weight, and its core HR, time tracking, and benefits modules sit inside a familiar payroll-first framework that scales to several thousand employees.

The experience is where age tells. G2 reviewers flag difficult navigation and poor customer support as recurring complaints, and the Rippling UK comparison describes a dated interface that lags today’s cloud platforms. Advanced HR functionality depends on which optional modules you buy, and the whole system reads as pay-led rather than people-led. For a buyer whose priority is engagement and a modern day-to-day experience, ADP’s strengths point the other way, toward payroll accuracy over HR polish.

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM: Configurable Enterprise Scale

Core strengths: global HCM, advanced workforce modelling, talent and succession, deep localisation, security and governance, Oracle Cloud and ERP integration.

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM is an enterprise suite for organisations running at real scale, part of a wider cloud where HR, finance, and ERP share one infrastructure. Extensive localisation, advanced workforce modelling, and strong governance make it a fit for multinationals, and companies already invested in Oracle’s stack get smoother integration than a standalone tool would give.

That depth brings weight. The Rippling UK comparison notes that implementation consumes extensive resources, that pricing targets larger enterprise budgets, and that the footprint can exceed what most mid-market organisations need. Oracle expects dedicated internal teams to manage configuration, reporting, and optimisation over a rollout measured in months. For a UK company in the 200 to 3,000 band that wants to be live this quarter rather than next year, a lighter modern suite reaches value far sooner, which is where the up-market challengers earn their shortlist spot.

What To Check Before You Commit

The order above reflects how these systems handle a scaling UK workforce, but the right pick still depends on your headcount, your entities, and your payroll setup. Before you shortlist, pressure-test each vendor on the points where mid-market and enterprise deals go wrong.

• Native payroll or a bolted-on one. About half the platforms here run UK pay through an integration. Ask each vendor to walk the path a salary change takes from the employee record to the payslip, and count how many systems and hands it touches. Native payroll that files RTI to HMRC and handles auto-enrolment keeps that path short.
• Records that satisfy the Employment Rights Act 2025. Statutory sick pay has been payable from day one of absence since 6 April 2026, and employers must keep six years of annual leave and holiday pay records. Day-one paternity and unpaid parental leave are already live, and the unfair dismissal qualifying period drops to six months from 1 January 2027. Check the system calculates and stores all of this without manual overrides.
• Multi-entity structure. A London headquarters, a regional site, and an overseas subsidiary should share one set of people data while keeping local rules and currencies intact. Ask to see how the platform models more than one entity before you buy.
• Who runs the implementation. Enterprise suites are partner-led projects measured in months; modern mid-market cores can go live in weeks with your own team. A scaling business without a dedicated HRIS lead should be honest about which camp it can support.
• Cost at twice your headcount. Most vendors here quote custom pricing, so compare on structure. Ask what triggers a price rise, whether headcount bands, modules, entities, or countries, and what renewal looks like. A platform that’s affordable at 200 people and painful at 500 is the wrong platform.

Choosing The Best HR System For A Scaling UK Company

There’s no universal winner among the best HR systems, because a 220-person UK company with one entity and a 4,000-person group across five countries are shopping for different things. What separates the field is whether a platform can carry you up-market without a re-platform. The enterprise suites (Workday, Oracle, ADP) bring depth but demand months of implementation and dedicated teams. The SMB-leaning tools (Bright HR, People HR, BambooHR) are quick to stand up but hit a ceiling as entities and headcount climb.

Bob sits where this audience needs it, holding 200 to 5,000-plus people on one modern core, running native UK payroll with HMRC filing and auto-enrolment, supporting multi-entity structures, and keeping GDPR-grade controls in place, all with an interface people use without training. That combination of enterprise scale and modern experience, with a go-live measured in weeks rather than quarters, is why Bob earns the top spot for a UK organisation scaling past its first HR tool. Book the demo to see how it maps to your headcount, entities, and payroll before you decide.

Choosing A UK HR System

The UK market splits by size. Smaller teams lean on tools like Bright HR and People HR, while scaling and enterprise organisations shortlist Bob, Personio, Sage People, Rippling, Workday, and Oracle. For a company in the 200 to 5,000-plus band, the list narrows to systems that hold multi-entity data and native UK payroll on one record, which is where the modern cores separate from the SMB-first tools.

Large enterprises with dedicated HRIS teams often choose Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, or SAP for depth of analytics and governance, accepting longer, partner-led implementations in return. Companies that want enterprise scale with a modern interface and a faster go-live tend to shortlist the newer cloud suites instead, weighing everyday usability and speed-to-value against raw configurability.

The post Best HR Systems For Mid-Size And Enterprise Businesses In The UK appeared first on 91探花.

That is exactly why there is a great change taking place. Business owners are looking for a smarter solution than being swamped with administrative tasks or rushing to hire expensive, full-time, in-office staff.

How Are Virtual Assistants Revolutionising Entrepreneurship?

The smarter way to build a business is with virtual assistants. The old way of building a company required massive capital, a physical office building and massive payroll risk. The modern entrepreneur is building a lean, agile machine. If you are working in your business instead of on your business, it may be time to consider hiring your first virtual assistant.

1. Massive Cost Savings

Having a full-time, in-house employee is costly. Add in recruitment costs, taxes, benefits, insurance and paid time off, on top of the base salary.

Virtual assistants are independent contractors. They only get paid for the productive hours they work or a set monthly retainer. This eliminates overhead costs and saves businesses up to 78% in operating costs according to industry estimates.

2. Freedom To Focus On Core Business Strategy

When you start a business, you wear all the hats. You鈥檙e the CEO, the marketer, the accountant, the caretaker. As your business grows, though, you can鈥檛 afford to get bogged down in day-to-day administration and lose sight of the big picture.

Free up your mental bandwidth by offloading repetitive tasks like scheduling meetings, sorting emails or data entry to a virtual assistant. This lets you focus on high-impact activities like product development, strategic partnerships and revenue generation.

3. No Need For Extra Office Space

Physical office space is a huge money drain. Every new hire gets a desk and a comfy chair and a computer and software licenses and physical space in a building. Virtual assistants work remotely from their own offices, providing their own equipment and high speed internet. You can grow your team to five or ten or twenty people without ever having to expand your physical office space or buy another piece of hardware.

4. Access To A Global Talent Pool

If you only hire from a local area you are limited by geography and the local cost of living. If you鈥檙e in a tech hub, talent competition is fierce and crazy expensive. Virtual assistants open up the world. You can find highly educated, experienced and specialised specialists from all over the world that will fit your specific needs and budget.

5. Ability To Scale Up Or Down

Business demand is irregular. Retail businesses may be very busy during the holidays, but slow in the summer. A startup in its launch phase may require a lot of administrative support, but less so in later maintenance.

Traditional employment contracts make it difficult and stressful to change your workforce. Scaling is easy with Virtual assistants. You can easily add hours during peak seasons and cut back when things slow down, so you never pay for idle time.

6. Improved Work-Life Balance

Many entrepreneurs start a business to have freedom, but end up working 80-hour weeks and burning out. Constant stress is bad for your health, bad for your business.

A virtual assistant is a buffer. By giving away your most time-consuming tasks, you get your evenings and weekends back. You can even go on vacation or spend time with your family knowing your inbox is being taken care of and your customers are being taken care of.

7. Increased Productivity And Efficiency

Virtual assistants are efficiency experts. They are very focused on delivering results within the hours they bill, either because they work with multiple clients or because they have strict tracking requirements.

Additionally, your in-house team members can focus on their core responsibilities without getting distracted by administrative side quests as they handle the repetitive tasks. Everybody gets more productive.

8. Round-the-Clock Business Coverage

If your customers are global, your business needs to be global as well. If your customers in another country are trying to buy your product or ask for support and you are sleeping, you are losing money.

Create a 鈥渇ollow-the-sun鈥� model by hiring virtual assistants in different time zones. Your business can provide social media monitoring or technical support or 24/7 customer service, without you having to pull all nighters.

9. Specialised Skills On Demand

You probably don’t need a full-time graphic designer, full-time copywriter or full-time SEO expert. Most small businesses do not have the budget for a full-time professional to fill these niche roles.

The virtual assistant industry has changed. Now you can hire specialised virtual assistants. Whether you need someone to manage your Pinterest account, edit your weekly podcast, handle your bookkeeping or build sales funnels, you can find a virtual assistant with that exact skill set for just a few hours a week.

10. Seamless Social Media And Marketing Management

Consistency is the key to social media success. But writing content, scheduling posts, replying to comments and even engaging with followers takes hours every single day.

Entrepreneurs are giving these keys to Virtual assistants. A virtual assistant can take your raw ideas and turn them into graphics using tools such as Canva, schedule them across your platforms and keep your brand active online while you focus on your operations.

11. Accelerated Business Growth

Speed is the king in business. A lead who fills out a contact form on your website and waits two days to hear back is already lost to your competitor. A virtual assistant handling lead intake, managing emails and updating CRMs and your response times plummet. Faster follow-ups lead to higher conversion rates, happier customers and faster business growth.

12. Reduced Training And Onboarding Time

Many virtual assistants are already experts in the tools that modern businesses use daily such as Slack, Trello, Asana, G suite and various CRMs. When you hire an experienced virtual assistant, you don鈥檛 need to train them on how to use basic software or how to manage an inbox. They鈥檙e ready to hit the ground running on day one, saving you weeks of frustrating onboarding time.

The post 12 Reasons Entrepreneurs Are Turning To Virtual Assistants appeared first on 91探花.

The good news is that businesses can take proactive steps to support their workforce through ergonomic assessments, workplace wellness initiatives and early intervention programmes. Investing in employee health not only helps prevent musculoskeletal issues but also improves productivity, engagement and long-term business performance.

Why Is Back Pain Such A Common Workplace Problem?

Back pain is one of the most common health issues affecting employees across a wide range of industries. Many people spend long hours sitting at desks, working on computers, driving, or performing repetitive physical tasks, all of which can place strain on the spine and surrounding muscles. Poor posture, inadequate workstation or office setups, heavy lifting and a lack of regular movement can all contribute to the development of back pain over time.

Modern working habits have also increased the risk of musculoskeletal problems. Hybrid and remote working can lead to employees using dining tables, sofas, or other unsuitable workspaces instead of ergonomic office equipment. Without proper support and regular movement throughout the day, minor aches can develop into chronic pain, affecting both employee well-being and workplace performance.

Why Should Employers Invest In Employee Back Health?

Investing in employee health benefits benefits both the workforce and the business. Healthy employees are generally more comfortable, engaged and productive, while organisations benefit from reduced absenteeism, lower healthcare-related costs and improved staff retention.听

Supporting employee well-being also demonstrates that a business values its people, helping to strengthen workplace culture and employee satisfaction. Simple initiatives such as ergonomic assessments, adjustable workstations, posture training and wellness programmes can significantly reduce the risk of back pain.

What Role Does Movement Play In Preventing Workplace Back Pain?

Regular movement is one of the most effective ways to prevent workplace back pain. Sitting or standing in the same position for extended periods places continuous pressure on the spine, muscles and joints, increasing stiffness and discomfort.听

Taking short breaks to stretch, walk, or change position throughout the day helps improve circulation, reduce muscle tension and maintain flexibility.

Could Back Pain Be Your Company’s Most Expensive Productivity Problem?

Back pain is often viewed as a personal health issue, but its impact extends far beyond individual employees. For businesses, it can become a hidden cost that affects productivity, attendance, employee engagement and overall performance. Even when employees continue working despite experiencing discomfort, they may struggle to concentrate, complete tasks efficiently, or maintain the same level of performance.

The financial impact can quickly add up through increased sick leave, reduced productivity, temporary staff cover, healthcare expenses and employee turnover. Businesses may also experience delays in projects, reduced customer service standards and lower team morale when employees are unable to perform at their best.听

How Does Back Pain Affect Employee Productivity?

Back pain doesn’t only affect physical comfort. It can also have a significant impact on workplace performance. Employees experiencing ongoing discomfort may find it harder to concentrate, complete tasks efficiently, or maintain consistent performance throughout the working day. Back pain can affect employee productivity by:

• Reducing concentration and focus during daily tasks
• Slowing work due to discomfort or limited mobility
• Increasing absenteeism through sick leave
• Contributing to presenteeism, where employees are at work but unable to perform at their best
• Lowering energy levels and overall motivation
• Reducing collaboration if employees avoid certain physical activities or meetings
• Affecting morale and overall job satisfaction
• Delaying projects and affecting overall team performance

What Does Back Pain Cost Businesses?

The cost of back pain to businesses extends well beyond medical expenses. Lost productivity, increased absenteeism, reduced employee engagement and higher staff turnover can all place financial pressure on an organisation.听

When employees are unable to work efficiently or require extended periods away from work, businesses often face additional costs through overtime, temporary staffing, recruitment and training replacements.

Can Better Workplace Health Actually Improve Business Performance?

Yes. Businesses that prioritise employee health often experience improvements across multiple areas of performance. When employees feel physically comfortable and supported, they are generally more engaged, motivated and productive. Reducing workplace health issues such as back pain can minimise disruptions, improve attendance and help teams perform more consistently.

What Are The Long-Term Benefits Of Investing In Employee Wellbeing?

Supporting employee well-being is not simply a short-term initiative. Businesses that consistently invest in their employees’ physical and mental health are often better positioned to attract talent, improve performance and build resilient teams. Some long-term benefits include:

• Higher employee productivity.
• Reduced absenteeism and sickness-related leave.
• Lower staff turnover and improved retention.
• Increased employee engagement and motivation.
• Better workplace morale and team collaboration.
• Lower healthcare and injury-related costs over time.
• Better customer service through a healthier, more engaged workforce.
• Stronger long-term business performance and organisational resilience.

How Can Businesses Create A Healthier And More Productive Workplace?

Creating a healthier workplace begins with making employee wellbeing a core part of business culture rather than a one-time initiative. Employers should assess workplace ergonomics, provide suitable equipment and encourage healthy habits such as regular movement, stretching and taking breaks throughout the working day.听

Offering ergonomic chairs, adjustable desks and posture guidance can significantly reduce the risk of back pain. Businesses should also promote open communication about workplace health so employees feel comfortable reporting discomfort before it develops into a more serious issue. Occupational health support, wellness programmes, health education and early intervention can all contribute to healthier employees and a more productive workforce.听

By taking a proactive approach to employee wellbeing, organisations can reduce health-related disruptions while creating a workplace where employees can perform at their best.

Maidesite, founded in 2020, is an intelligent office brand under the wholly owned subsidiary of听MAIDESITE GLOBAL PTE. LTD. (Singapore).听

Maidesite are a technology company focused on the research, development, production, and sales of smart office products. The brand enjoys a strong reputation in Europe and Japan, with more than 250,000 high鈥慹nd users of our electric standing desks across Europe. Maidesite is committed to providing scenario鈥慴ased, intelligent, and premium office solutions, aiming to redefine the healthy office experience and inspire creativity in an unlimited workspace.

The post Could Back Pain Be Hurting Workplace Productivity? appeared first on 91探花.

We seem to be living in an increasingly polarised world, in which we’re constantly forced to pick a side: you agree or you don’t, you’re for something or against it, you’re either part of the conversation or you’re on the wrong side of it.

But the thing is, reality is rarely quite so straightforward.

There is, after all, plenty of space between two opposing viewpoints, but we seem to have forgotten about the grey. People can hold conflicting ideas, change their minds and see merit in arguments they don’t entirely agree with. In fact, it’s important that we remember that we can do these things.

But the problem is, nuance doesn’t always make for a particularly satisfying headline, and we seem to be coming more and more comfortable with seeing things in absolutes.

That’s where Quite Contrary comes in. 91探花’s series is built around challenging assumptions, questioning conventional wisdom and giving a platform to opinions that don’t necessarily fit neatly into the mainstream narrative.

Because disagreement doesn’t have to mean division, and sometimes, the most interesting conversations happen when we stop trying to decide who’s right and start asking why.

This Week’s Contrarian

This week, our “unpopular opinion” comes from Danny Sullivan, Founder and CEO of Nomada Digital. Sullivan believes, in perhaps one of our hottest takes yet, that digital marketing agencies that lead their campaigns with Google Ads are, essentially, lighting your money on fire…

Danny Sullivan, Founder and CEO of Nomada Digital

Danny Sullivan is the Founder and CEO of Nomada Digital, a operating in both UK and US markets.听Founded in 2020, the remote-first agency specialises in SEO, AI visibility, paid media, PR and CRO, helping businesses improve their visibility across the platforms where modern buyers search and make decisions.

Danny’s Hot Take

“Agencies that lead with Google Ads are lighting your money on fire.”听

“Many founders I talk to want to start with Google Ads because it feels fast – you turn it on, get clicks, and see something happen straight away. But Google Ads works best when everything else is already in place, when organic visibility is building, quality scores are climbing, and your brand already means something to the person searching. When you run it first, in isolation, you’re paying premium prices just to convince strangers you’re credible, which is one of the most expensive mistakes a growing business can make.

鈥淚’ve seen businesses burn through months of budget on paid clicks that convert at a fraction of what the same budget would deliver once the foundation exists. But Google Ads isn’t the problem, the sequencing is. It should be the layer you add once search, content and earned media have already built some trust for you, not the thing carrying your entire visibility on its own.鈥�

Here’s What the 91探花 Community Had To Say

• Ra煤l Menoyo: Founder at Citora
• Andre Magrini: Global CRO, AI Revenue Architect, OGI Systems
• Christina Lindley: Founder and CEO at VPRG Consulting
• Chris Coussons:听Founder at Visionary
• Patrick Gibbs: Founder at Epiphany Dynamics
• Carlos Benavides: Founder at Barlo Digital
• Dr. Morissa Schwartz: Founder of GenZ Publishing and Dr. Rissy鈥檚 Writing & Marketing
• Patricia Gunter: Fractional Chief Marketing Officer at Duplia Marketing
• Chris Ferris: Senior Vice President of Digital Strategy at Pierpont Communications
• Peter Kiefer: Founder at Mirel
• Maciej Turek: Independent Growth Consultant
• Robin Dimond: Founder and CEO of Fifth & Cor, Business Growth Strategist and Marketing Innovator
• Nick Trinnaman: Founder of RankMoss and Ecommerce Director at Esposti Ltd.
• Bruce Shields: Founder and President, ABS Tag & Title
• John Colascione:听Founder and CEO at

Ra煤l Menoyo,听Founder at Citora

“I run a small AI visibility agency in Spain and I have never bought a click for it. I agree with the sequencing, and I would push it one step further. Ads buy you attention inside Google. They buy you nothing inside an assistant. When a buyer asks ChatGPT or Perplexity for a shortlist in your category, the model builds that list out of things that already exist, comparison pages, forum threads, editorial coverage. There is no bid there. Ranking and being recommended by AI have become two different games, and paid search only plays one of them.

“Where I do not fully agree, ads are the fastest honest way to find out if anyone wants what you sell, and that is worth paying for. What I would not ask them to do is carry your credibility, because the person who clicks goes and checks you anyway.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you are credible?

“Other people’s pages. Nothing you write about yourself does that work. The click lands, they search your name, they read what someone else wrote, and increasingly they ask an assistant what it knows about you. If that answer comes back thin, the ad paid for a visit that ends in doubt. I track this as a rate rather than a position, because the same question asked twice does not always return the same answer, so what I can tell a client is how often they show up, not where they sit.”

Andre Magrini, Global CRO, AI Revenue Architect, OGI Systems

“Google Ads is not inherently wasteful; using it before the commercial system is ready is. Paid search can validate demand quickly, but it cannot manufacture trust, differentiation, or conversion discipline. Before scaling spend, a company needs a clear offer, evidence that the problem matters, credible proof, a useful landing experience, and a process for turning inquiries into revenue. Organic visibility helps, but the deeper requirement is an operating foundation: positioning, proof, data, follow-up, and accountability.

“I have seen companies treat clicks as progress while their funnel leaks after the first interaction. In that situation, ads only make an inefficient system fail faster and more expensively. The right sequence is not always 鈥渙rganic first, ads later.鈥� It is 鈥渆vidence and conversion readiness first, controlled paid experiments second, scale third.鈥� Google Ads should accelerate a working growth architecture, not substitute for one. Once the foundation is measurable, paid search becomes a useful instrument for learning and growth rather than a costly substitute for strategy.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you are credible?

“Independent proof, specific client outcomes, authoritative third-party coverage, transparent expertise, and a coherent landing experience that all tell the same story. ”

Christina Lindley,听Founder and CEO at VPRG Consulting

“I agree, but Google Ads aren鈥檛 the problem. Paying for attention before anyone has a reason to trust you is. Founders like ads because they can see the clicks and costs in real time. But if your offer is unclear, your proof is thin, or your landing page does not convert, you are just paying more people to notice. Before I put money behind ads, I want sharp positioning, customer results, a credible website, and evidence that the message works. Organic search and content can build that foundation, but so can partnerships, press, referrals, reviews, and trusted communities.

“I have seen one good partnership create more confidence than months of posting content. Ads work when they amplify something people already understand and believe. Asking them to create awareness, credibility, and conversion all at once is where the money disappears. That is not a channel problem. It is a sequencing problem.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you are credible?

“Credibility has to come from somewhere: customer results, reviews, press, a respected partner, or a community that already trusts you. Ads can introduce you. They cannot make an unsupported claim believable.”

Chris Coussons,听Founder at Visionary

鈥淚 think saying that agencies which lead with Google Ads are 鈥榣ighting your money on fire鈥� is too broad, because for plenty of businesses paid search is one of the quickest ways to find out whether there鈥檚 real demand, what people are actually looking for, which messages resonate and which searches convert when there鈥檚 genuine intent behind the click.

鈥淚 also wouldn鈥檛 necessarily tie organic visibility too closely to Quality Score, because Google bases that on expected click-through rate, ad relevance and landing page experience.

鈥淲here I do agree is that it can become expensive when businesses start paying for traffic before getting the basics of the landing page right. If someone lands on the site and it鈥檚 not immediately clear why they should choose that business, there鈥檚 little there to give them confidence or the page makes it difficult to take the next step, putting more money into ads isn鈥檛 going to solve those issues.

鈥淔or me, the order matters less than making sure what you鈥檙e offering and the experience after the click are strong enough before you start paying to send people there.鈥�

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you鈥檙e credible?

鈥淭hat credibility has to come from what they see after the click. Clear messaging, genuine reviews, transparent information, recognisable trust signals and a site that gives people confidence in the business can all do that. Organic visibility can strengthen trust, but I wouldn鈥檛 say it always has to come first.鈥�

Patrick Gibbs, Founder at Epiphany Dynamics听

“I run an AI automation agency, so I watch this mistake happen from the buyer’s side constantly. A business with no reviews, no organic presence, and no brand recognition turns on Google Ads expecting it to fix all three at once. It can’t. Every click is paying full price to introduce yourself to a total stranger, and strangers convert at a fraction of the rate of someone who already found you organically, read a review, or got a referral. I’ve had prospects come to me wanting a paid campaign built before they’d even claimed their Google Business Profile or fixed a site that loaded in six seconds. The ad spend doesn’t fail because the targeting is bad. It fails because the thing the ad points at hasn’t earned trust yet. Ads convert existing credibility into revenue. They don’t create credibility from nothing.

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you are credible?

“If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads: nothing convinces the stranger you’re credible in that scenario, which is exactly the problem. The click has to do double duty, sell trust and sell the product in one visit, and it almost never manages both.”

Carlos Benavides, Founder at Barlo Digital

“Google Ads does burn money when it runs first, but organic maturity is not what decides that. Measurement is. I run paid search for home services companies. Across $867,000 in spend and 191,000 clicks in Texas, California and Florida, we booked 4,420 jobs at a $196 cost per acquisition. None of those accounts had a strong organic foundation underneath them.

“The account that taught me this was recording 1,150 conversions while only 278 of them ever reached the bidding algorithm. Google was optimizing against a quarter of the truth and charging full price for the guess. The founder believed the channel was expensive. The channel was fine. The feedback loop was broken.

“Money burns in paid search when the algorithm is fed bad data, not when the brand is unknown. An unknown business with accurate conversion tracking will beat a familiar one without it.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you are credible?

“The landing page does, not the brand. Nobody arriving from a paid ad has heard of you, and most of them arrive on a phone. We render client pages at 390 pixels wide, the viewport that traffic actually lands on, and check what breaks there before we check anything else. What convinces a stranger is specific evidence: real job counts, real service areas, real prices, and a phone number that connects to a person. Strangers are not looking for fame. They are looking for proof you will show up.”

Dr. Morissa Schwartz, Founder of GenZ Publishing and Dr. Rissy鈥檚 Writing & Marketing听

“I agree with the sequencing argument, with one caveat: Google Ads can sometimes validate demand before a full organic engine exists. The danger is treating clicks as proof of brand trust. Ads amplify whatever foundation is present, including confusion, weak positioning, or a landing page that answers none of the buyer鈥檚 doubts. For most growing businesses, organic search, useful content, reviews, earned media, and a recognizable point of view lower the burden ads must carry.

“They give prospects repeated evidence that the company understands the problem and will still exist after the click. Paid search can then accelerate a credible story instead of renting attention at premium rates. I would test small, tightly scoped campaigns early, use them to learn which messages convert, and build organic assets from those lessons. Scale comes later, once the site, offer, proof, and follow-up experience can turn borrowed traffic into durable demand more effectively.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you are credible?

“If you skip the organic foundation, credibility must come from independent proof: specific results, reviews, earned media, recognizable clients, a precise offer, and a landing page that answers the buyer鈥檚 real doubts. An ad can create attention; it cannot manufacture trust.”听

Patricia Gunter,听Fractional Chief Marketing Officer at Duplia Marketing

“Google Ads give you visibility while you continue to pay; once you stop, you become a ghost online. These ads don’t influence how AI engines recognize your business. When buyers consult ChatGPT or Copilot for recommendations, their responses rely on your organic presence. Your potential clients are already using AI tools to search online. Forrester found that 94% of B2B buyers now use generative AI or conversational search

“When I launched Duplia Marketing, I decided to invest in its organic online presence rather than in Google Ads or paid search. Within only 2 months, the website appeared in over 17,000 searches on both Google and Bing for more than 600 terms. One blog post was cited 283 times by Copilot in a single month, and leads were generated through AI search. My recommendation: focus on building your organic presence first and use paid ads only for keywords where organic search has not yet established visibility.

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you are credible?

“Google Ads will for sure drive people to your website. A second step in the purchase process will be to research your website, your company name, and whatever the AI engine reports about you. If your information is inconsistent or not credible in those other sources, you’re risking paying for visitors who won’t engage or even consider buying from you. Establishing credibility is key, and Google Ads won’t do that for you.”

Chris Ferris, Senior Vice President of Digital Strategy at Pierpont Communications听

“Non-branded Google Ads can be valuable before a company has sufficient brand awareness. A smart non-branded search campaign can drive prospects to your site. So in this case, it’s not necessarily lighting money on fire.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you’re credible?

“If you go straight to ads and they do drive prospects to your website, you have to have a high-quality, professional website. Too many businesses spend money on online ads only to lose customers because of a poor experience on their website. Invest in a good website before investing in online advertising!”

Peter Kiefer, Founder at Mirel听

“I鈥檓 somewhere in between. Google Ads can waste money when an agency treats it as a substitute for positioning, credibility and a website that converts. But paid search does not always need to wait for organic visibility. For a new business, it can test demand, reveal which messages resonate and reach high-intent buyers while SEO and earned media take time.

“The real issue is readiness, not whether organic or paid comes first. Before spending heavily, a business needs a clear offer, credible proof, focused landing pages, accurate tracking and a sensible follow-up process. Without those foundations, ads amplify weaknesses and make every lesson more expensive.

“I would start with a tightly controlled campaign, not make Google Ads carry the whole growth strategy. Use it to gather evidence and capture existing demand, while building content, reputation and organic visibility alongside it. Paid and organic should reinforce each other from the outset.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you’re credible?

“Specific proof: relevant case studies, recognizable clients, genuine reviews, clear expertise and a landing page that directly answers the searcher鈥檚 need. Without those signals, an ad only buys attention. It does not create trust.”

Maciej Turek, Independent Growth Consultant

“I disagree with the absolute claim. Google Ads can waste money when the offer, tracking and landing page are weak, but that does not mean organic visibility must come first. For businesses serving demand, paid search is often the quickest way to learn which queries, propositions and customer segments convert. Waiting months for organic traction before testing that demand can be the more expensive decision.

“The real sequencing question is not paid versus organic. It is whether the basics are credible: a clear offer, proof, a landing page, conversion tracking and a follow-up process. If those are missing, ads simply expose the problems faster. I would use Google Ads early, but narrowly. Start with high-intent searches, control the query mix, measure qualified leads or revenue rather than clicks, and use the findings to improve the website and organic strategy. Ads should produce learning before they are expected to produce scale.”

If you skip the organic foundation, what convinces a stranger you’re credible?

“The landing page has to do that work: a specific offer, relevant proof, credible case studies, a clear process and a low-risk next step.”

Robin Dimond, Founder and CEO of Fifth & Cor, Business Growth Strategist and Marketing Innovator

“Google Ads aren鈥檛 the problem. Expecting Google Ads to do the job of an entire marketing strategy is.

“As AI becomes part of how consumers discover, research, and evaluate brands, organic visibility and third-party credibility have become increasingly valuable. A brand needs a digital ecosystem around it: social content, earned media, executive thought leadership, authoritative articles, strong search visibility, and consistent messaging across channels.

“That foundation does two things. It gives consumers more reasons to trust you when they encounter an ad, and it gives AI platforms more credible signals to understand who you are and why you matter.

“Paid media can accelerate visibility, but it cannot manufacture authority. If someone clicks your ad and finds very little evidence that your brand is established, credible, or relevant, you paid for attention you weren鈥檛 prepared to convert.

“The smartest strategy isn鈥檛 organic versus paid. It鈥檚 building the foundation first, then using paid media to amplify it.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you’re credible?

“If you skip the organic foundation, you鈥檙e giving a stranger very little reason to believe your brand is credible. An ad can buy their attention, but it can鈥檛 buy their trust.”

Nick Trinnaman, Founder of RankMoss and Ecommerce Director at Esposti Ltd. 听

“Google Ads isn’t lighting money on fire – running it first is. Ads are an amplifier, not a foundation. Point them at a brand people already trust and they compound. Point them at a cold, thin site and you pay a credibility tax on every click: premium CPCs to rent attention you haven’t earned. I’ve seen businesses burn months of budget on paid clicks that converted at a fraction of what the same spend delivered once the foundation existed. The sequencing matters because trust now lives outside the ad.

“When someone clicks, they check whether the site actually answers their question, whether the brand is mentioned anywhere else, whether the tools they use vouch for it. If there’s nothing there, the click is wasted. Build the foundation first – organic visibility, useful content, earned mentions – then let ads pour fuel on a fire that’s already lit.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you’re credible?

“If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, almost nothing on the ad itself convinces a stranger you’re credible. Credibility is what they find after the click – reviews, real content that answers their questions, mentions elsewhere, and increasingly what an AI says about you when they ask. Skip the foundation and you’ve paid for a click into a credibility vacuum.”

Bruce Shields, Founder and President, ABS Tag & Title

“I think there’s a lot of truth in this opinion. Too many businesses view Google Ads as a shortcut to growth when, in reality, it’s often an amplifier. It works best when there’s already something worth amplifying. If a prospective customer clicks an ad and finds a weak website, little proof of expertise, few customer reviews, and no meaningful content, the business ends up paying for traffic that was never likely to convert.

“That said, I wouldn’t go as far as saying agencies that lead with Google Ads are always wasting money. The issue is whether paid advertising is being used strategically or as a substitute for building trust. At ABS Tag & Title, we’ve found that educational content, customer success stories, industry expertise, and a strong reputation make every marketing dollar work harder. When prospects already recognize your name or can quickly verify your credibility, advertising becomes much more efficient. Trust lowers acquisition costs, and trust is rarely built through ads alone.”

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you’re credible?

“Very little. Most buyers look for validation before they take action. They check your website, search your company name, read reviews, look for industry expertise, and evaluate whether you’ve helped organizations like theirs before. If those trust signals aren’t there, you’re asking a stranger to believe your ad instead of your reputation, and that’s a difficult and expensive sales process.”

John Colascione, Founder and CEO at 听

鈥淎gencies aren’t 鈥榣ighting your money on fire鈥� simply because they lead with Google Ads. They’re lighting your money on fire if they lead with Google Ads without first ensuring the destination can convert the traffic they’re buying.

鈥淕oogle Ads solves a traffic problem. But it doesn’t solve a credibility or conversion problem. Credibility comes from what the visitor finds when they arrive: demonstrated expertise, real people, strong reviews, professional affiliations, certifications, BBB membership, recognizable clients and a website that gives them confidence in the business.

鈥淚f purchased visitors arrive at a weak website that fails to establish trust or give them a compelling reason to choose the business, buying more clicks simply means paying to expose those weaknesses to more people.

鈥淏oth organic and paid visibility are extremely valuable. Without a strong website and some level of credibility, you’ll be chasing your tail with either one. Get those pieces right, and both can be extremely effective.鈥�

If you skip the organic foundation and go straight to ads, what convinces a stranger you’re credible?

鈥淐redibility comes from what the visitor finds when they arrive: demonstrated expertise, real people, strong reviews, professional affiliations, certifications, BBB membership, recognizable clients and a website that gives them confidence in the business.”

The post Quite Contrary: According To Danny Sullivan, Agencies That Lead With Google Ads Are Burning Money appeared first on 91探花.