91探花

Netflix鈥檚 new reality series Wonka鈥檚 The Golden Ticket brings Gene Wilder鈥檚 famous Willy Wonka voice back more than 50 years after the original film. The streaming service says the series will feature a recreated version of Wilder鈥檚 voice, used with permission from the Gene Wilder Estate.

The announcement, naturally, brought in all kinds of reactions on the net and a lot of the reaction is not about the actual technology. People are asking if recreating the voice of a much loved actor adds anything new, even when permission has been granted.

Netflix said the recreated voice pays tribute to the 1971 film and honours Wilder鈥檚 performance. Karen B. Wilder, Gene Wilder鈥檚 wife, speaking on behalf of the Gene Wilder Estate, said, 鈥淢ore than five decades after Gene brought Willy Wonka to life, people of all ages and backgrounds around the world continue to find joy, laughter and inspiration in his performance.

鈥淕ene had a remarkable ability to bring humor, wonder and heart into people鈥檚 lives, and that connection has endured for generations. We are delighted that Wonka鈥檚 The Golden Ticket celebrates the warmth and imagination that he brought to the role, introducing that magic to a new generation while honoring the fans who have cherished it for decades.鈥�

听

How Are Voice Licences Changing Entertainment?

听

The Netflix announcement follows recent high profile voice licensing deals such as Sir Michael Parkinson鈥檚 voice, which has been recreated for a podcast series. Another popular one that comes to mind is how Disney continues to use James Earl Jones鈥� Darth Vader voice.

Benjamin Woollams, Founder and CEO of TrueRights, said, 鈥淎dvancements in voice AI are changing how familiar voices can be recreated, preserved and commercialised. Recent examples, from the AI recreation of Sir Michael Parkinson鈥檚 voice for a podcast series and Disney鈥檚 continued use of James Earl Jones鈥� iconic Darth Vader voice, to the reported use of Gene Wilder鈥檚 voice in a new Netflix series inspired by Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, show the entertainment industry is beginning to establish where audiences draw the line on AI generated performances. So far, the response suggests people aren鈥檛 inherently opposed to the technology, but acceptance depends on context, transparency and, above all, whether its use feels respectful and properly authorised.

鈥淭he technology itself is no longer the biggest hurdle. Today鈥檚 voice models are capable of producing remarkably convincing results. The real challenge is ensuring the rights behind a person鈥檚 voice can be evidenced and managed responsibly, with clear consent, licensing and governance. Michael Caine鈥檚 decision to license his voice for The Odyssey audiobook is a good example of how these technologies can create new opportunities when creators remain in control. As voice AI becomes more sophisticated, the ability to evidence ownership, consent and authenticity will only become more important.鈥�

听

What Will Decide If Recreated Voices Become The New 鈥淭hing鈥�?

听

Permission from an estate may answer the legal side, but it does not automatically settle public opinion. Fans often have an emotional attachment to famous performances, especially when the actor is no longer alive.

Woollams believes the long term success of voice AI depends less on the quality of the technology and more on how organisations handle rights and consent. As he put it, 鈥淯ltimately, success won鈥檛 depend solely on how the technology becomes. It will depend on whether organisations can demonstrate that voices have been used with the right permissions, under clear governance and in ways that audiences can trust.鈥�

听

Could This Be The Next Celeb Revenue Stream?

听

We know that influencers have been selling their likeness to AI companies, but could voice licensing be the next revenue stream? Experts have answered the question, and here鈥檚 what they think鈥�

听

Our Experts:

听

• Monica Tomasso, Chief AI Visibility Expert, Monic AI Systems
• Mahendra Balal, Technology Analyst, Sovereix
• Russell Twilligear, Head Of AI Research & Development, BlogBuster
• Paul Menes, Counsel, R Slates Law
• Dr. A.K. Pradeep, CEO and Founder, Sensori AI

听

Monica Tomasso, Chief AI Visibility Expert, Monic AI Systems

听

听
鈥淚 do think AI voice licensing will become an important revenue stream, but I believe the bigger shift is how businesses think about identity.

鈥淲e鈥檙e already seeing founders ask whether they should license their voice for podcasts, educational content, customer support, and multilingual experiences. One of my own clients wanted to translate founder conversations into Spanish while preserving the original voice and expertise behind the content. That isn鈥檛 just a technology decision. It鈥檚 a branding decision.

鈥淎 trusted voice is becoming another form of intellectual property. Just as businesses license trademarks or photography today, I expect recognisable voices to become assets that can be licensed across products, training, education, and customer experiences.

鈥淭he challenge will be trust and governance. Audiences will want to know when they鈥檙e hearing an AI generated voice, who approved it, and whether the content accurately reflects the person behind it. The businesses that succeed won鈥檛 simply clone a voice. They鈥檒l protect the authenticity that made people trust that voice in the first place.鈥�
听

Mahendra Balal, Technology Analyst, Sovereix

听

听
鈥淐elebrities are no longer just individuals; they are transitioning into enterprise software platforms. AI voice licensing is absolutely the next major revenue stream because it solves the ultimate bottleneck of celebrity monetization: physical scalability.

鈥淗istorically, a celebrity could only record one audiobook, narrate one documentary, or shoot one commercial at a time. Their income was strictly capped by their physical hours in a studio. By licensing an official, high-fidelity AI voice clone, a celebrity鈥檚 brand can be infinitely scaled.

鈥淭heir voice can simultaneously narrate a thousand personalized marketing campaigns, read localized audiobooks in fifty different languages, and serve as the premium voice assistant for a major tech ecosystem鈥攁ll while the actual human is asleep.

鈥淭he economic model will likely mirror the music industry鈥檚 royalty system. We will see the creation of 鈥淒igital IP Registries鈥� where a celebrity鈥檚 verified voice model is securely hosted. Every time a brand, video game, or content creator generates audio using that specific model, a micro-transaction royalty is automatically triggered.

鈥淗owever, the real battleground will be enforcement. The celebrities who successfully monetise this will be the ones who legally trademark their biometric audio data and aggressively enforce their 鈥渙fficial鈥� AI licenses, essentially turning their voice into a highly lucrative SaaS (Software as a Service) product.鈥�

听

Russell Twilligear, Head Of AI Research & Development, BlogBuster

听

听
鈥淵es, AI voice licensing will absolutely become a celebrity revenue stream. In fact, it鈥檚 going to be a cash cow for the right celebrity.

鈥淚f your voice is instantly recognizable like Morgan Freeman, your voice is no longer just part of your brand. It鈥檚 part of your inventory.

鈥淭he smart celebrities won鈥檛 be fighting AI. They will license their voice to it, control it and charge for it everytime it talks.

鈥淭he dumb move is selling your voice rights outright. The smart move is treating it like music rights. Controlled usage, limited categories, expiration dates and checks that keep flowing in.鈥�

听

Paul Menes, Of Counsel, R Slates Law

听

听
鈥淵es, AI voice licensing can continue to be a way for celebs to make money on and off-line. But to do so effectively, there are steps they need to take, both to protect against unauthorised uses of their voice and other characteristics, and to maximise their revenue from doing so.

鈥淪tate laws govern and protect the use of what was called a public figures鈥� 鈥渘ame face and likeness鈥�. (The catch phrase for this has become 鈥淣IL鈥�).

鈥淭here鈥檚 been no Federal uniformity for NIL laws. There are pending Federal bills for this, mostly around and due the desire to create uniformity in the marketplace for college athletes鈥� monetization of their NIL. They would also apply to non-college athlete NIL as well. celebrities.

鈥淐elebrities have always had U.S. trademark and copyright law to protect certain facets of their NIL. Recently, celebs (Taylor Swift, and Matthew McConaughey) have begun applying to register for trademark their voices, images, and certain phrases they鈥檙e considered known for.

鈥淭his is occurring to expand celebrities鈥� intellectual property protections in the digital age. It鈥檚 a legal strategy to combat unauthorized AI-generated content, and close a critical gap in NIL protections, as AI continues to get better at seamlessly manipulating voices and likenesses into false endorsements and deepfakes.鈥�

听

Dr. A.K. Pradeep, CEO and Founder, Sensori AI

听

听
鈥淟icensing likeness, whether it is a voice, a face, biomarkers appear to be ways in which celebs can generate value for their natural biological assets. However, Ai has made copying so infinitely easy that it is quite hard to say that an algorithmic voice WAS indeed generated from a human voice.

鈥淔or instance, Morgan Freeman鈥檚 gravely voice is known to millions. But Nature does not preclude another human being from having an identical voice. Unlike works of art that are created, the process by which Nature creates is unknown, and the changes that someone has identical bio assets is NON ZERO.

鈥淕enAi has shamelessly stolen ALL assets from humanity in the pursuit of a greater good 鈥� Suno is inspired by Music, Midjourney is inspired by Art, and ChatBots are inspired by All human created literature. Bio assets like the likeness of Voice and Facial features have already been absorbed by the algorithms.

鈥淚t is prudent business that nobody is making a big splash of this to avoid a backlash. The music industry jealously protects the rights of music creators but has largely been powerless to stop the indomitable march of Suno. Algorithms cleverly hide what 鈥渋nspired鈥� them.

鈥淭oday algorithms allow for the effective cloning of one鈥檚 own voice to do one鈥檚 own podcasts. The capability exists. The genie is out of the bottle. The voice asking the genie to get back into the bottle is the voice of AI. The genie will ignore it.鈥�